...just politics. The poor logic surrounding Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney's veto of the Emergency Contraception Bill clearly indicates he is a man intent on running for president and the Commonwealth be damned. In both his public statements and an op-ed piece in today's Boston Globe he decries being in a minority position in the country and Massachusetts on abortion, then says he will try to impose his will on Massachusetts...at the same time he is encouraging a democratic process to iron out differences.
How does this make sense? If the public opinion is a solid majority in favor of choice, and the legislature votes overwhelmingly in favor of the bill, what is the value of a democratic discussion if it results in him trying to impose his individual will on the people? How does that separate him from the judges that rule by "judicial mandate" (to use his inelegant phrase)? Romney claims that the constitution allows the state the settle controversial issues...apparently he missed the history of the civil war, civil rights and the Bill of Rights.
The legislature will overturn his veto and the bill will become law. Oddly enough it was the will of one man, former Speaker Tom Finneran, that prevented the bill from passing the legislature last year. The will of the public...through their elected representatives will make sure the bill becomes law this year. If Romney was sincerely interested in reducing abortions he would have enthusiastically grasped this opportunity to put this resource forward. Sadly, once again the Commonwealth falls victim to the ambitions of a Republican Governor who shows nothing but contempt for the lives and opinions of the residents. Can't he just be an ambassador somewhere?
Happily there are things we can do about this. Work with ProChoice Massachusetts to make sure the legislature stands firm. Here are two other solutions to the problem. Reilly and Patrick. Let's elect someone who cares about Massachusetts as Governor next year.
Recent Comments